CREDITS – Where is the Code? Crypto Code Review and GitHub Analysis

Crypto Games- Gamble Online
Home Video News Reports CREDITS – Where is the Code? Crypto Code Review and GitHub Analysis
Published on July 4, 2019
BitBay - Exchange Digital Currencies

Today we check CREDITS GitHub

Good Morning Crypto
📣 Join Telegram channel t.me/joinchat/AAAAAE2xJE4l8xhC8MU4cg

👫👭👬Social:
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/ivanliljeqvist/
Instagram: instagram.com/ivanontech/
Steemit: steemit.com/@ivanli
Facebook: facebook.com/ivanontech/

DISCLAIMER: This is NOT financial advice. This is just my opinions. I am not responsible for any investment decisions that you choose to make.

source

Ledger Nano S - The secure hardware wallet
  1. FAKE IT TILL YOU MAKE IT HAHA CREDITS IS A SCAM. Contact columbian blockchain lab. Credits said they verified their blockchain. They didnt and requested credits to remove the story which they still havent.and that fake video of 500k tps haha you guys so gullible

  2. Hey guys. Want to get banned from Ivan’s telegram? Ask him to do and updated video on dgtx. You will get banned, just like my friend James and I did.

  3. john r

    Great vid.. Credits

  4. Exilent review…i appriciated. thanks for genuine review..

  5. Quality content as always. Love the analysis…Thanks for the video ~

  6. Where is Suppoman? Is he still around? He should answer this question.

  7. Lol so many fake YouTube profiles commenting here about Credits LOL. Check the people who have commented here lol this happened during the 2nd episode u released too lol

  8. This is Ivan skimming a repo and stating "there is code to see" and "there are commits from a year ago" and "they need more comments in their code" and offers very little else. He doesn't go in depth about the code. He doesn't dive into what makes it unique or even good. Ivan basically read function names which in theory could do absolutely nothing. It could just produce random numbers add them together and return nothing back. Just because it could have a function named sendMeToTheMoon(), doesn't mean it will. Good luck to Credits and their holders but as Ivan begrudgingly said at the end – need 3rd party reviews for their decentralization, transaction speed, and consensus.

  9. it will be in top 10 soon …Credits is Legit …

  10. CREDITS is HEAVILY CENTRALISED… STAY AWAY. SCAM SCAM

  11. CREDITS IS A SCAM !!! DONT BUY THIS IS A PAID REVIEW AND THEY ARE WAITING FOR THE PUMP SO THEY CAN DUMP.

  12. Developers are lazy and this is reflected in the code i wouldn't waste my time with Credits.

  13. Not sure about Credits they only have 1 or 2 dedicated developers although i havnt and wont waste my time going through the code for the reason the way the commits are managed in such a messy un organised and lazy way with poor labelling it will most probably be reflected in the code. E.g would you eat at at a restaurant if you nee the chef kitchen in his own home was not clean and messy.

  14. Nviaz

    great video and cool project 🙂

  15. Looks like it's shilling reveiw payed by Credits

  16. Very good review Ivan on the progress of the work also nice you underlined the Sonar Cloud integration for static code verification

  17. Thanks Ivan for taking the time to do a Credits review!

  18. SonarCloud is good to have, but they have a test coverage of 0.0%. For Code, which is dealing with money, this is very very bad. At the end it means that they hope their code doing the right things (without having any verification) :S

  19. Who doubts about Credits, please know about this video. The truth is that Credits did better than what Ivan had evaluated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.